On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Dean Brooks wrote:

> It this fix something the rest of us should be concerned about?  
> 
> That is, is this considered an emergency hotfix we should all install,
> or does it only affect unusual configurations?

It's hard to say. I'll put the patch below in case anybody wants to 
install it on 4.66.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book



*** exim-4.66/src/deliver.c Mon Jan  8 14:25:36 2007
--- deliver.c   Tue Feb  6 14:19:00 2007
***************
*** 5639,5650 ****
          string_sprintf("R:%s", addr->domain), 0);
  
      /* Otherwise, if there is an existing retry record in the database, add
!     retry items to delete both forms. Since the domain might have been
!     rewritten (expanded to fully qualified) as a result of routing, ensure
!     that the rewritten form is also deleted. */
  
      else if (testflag(addr, af_dr_retry_exists))
        {
        retry_add_item(addr, addr->address_retry_key, rf_delete);
        retry_add_item(addr, addr->domain_retry_key, rf_delete);
        if (Ustrcmp(addr->domain, old_domain) != 0)
--- 5637,5652 ----
          string_sprintf("R:%s", addr->domain), 0);
  
      /* Otherwise, if there is an existing retry record in the database, add
!     retry items to delete both forms. We must also allow for the possibility
!     of a routing retry that includes the sender address. Since the domain 
might
!     have been rewritten (expanded to fully qualified) as a result of routing,
!     ensure that the rewritten form is also deleted. */
  
      else if (testflag(addr, af_dr_retry_exists))
        {
+       uschar *altkey = string_sprintf("%s:<%s>", addr->address_retry_key,
+         sender_address);
+       retry_add_item(addr, altkey, rf_delete);
        retry_add_item(addr, addr->address_retry_key, rf_delete);
        retry_add_item(addr, addr->domain_retry_key, rf_delete);
        if (Ustrcmp(addr->domain, old_domain) != 0)
          wmf_text = next_emf(wmf, US"header");
*** exim-4.66/src/transports/smtp.c Mon Jan  8 14:25:37 2007
--- transports/smtp.c   Tue Feb  6 14:19:00 2007
***************
*** 643,652 ****
      addr->transport_return = PENDING_OK;
  
      /* If af_dr_retry_exists is set, there was a routing delay on this 
address;
!     ensure that any address-specific retry record is expunged. */
  
      if (testflag(addr, af_dr_retry_exists))
        retry_add_item(addr, addr->address_retry_key, rf_delete);
      }
  
    /* Timeout while reading the response */
--- 654,669 ----
      addr->transport_return = PENDING_OK;
  
      /* If af_dr_retry_exists is set, there was a routing delay on this 
address;
!     ensure that any address-specific retry record is expunged. We do this both
!     for the basic key and for the version that also includes the sender. */
  
      if (testflag(addr, af_dr_retry_exists))
+       {
+       uschar *altkey = string_sprintf("%s:<%s>", addr->address_retry_key,
+         sender_address);
+       retry_add_item(addr, altkey, rf_delete);
        retry_add_item(addr, addr->address_retry_key, rf_delete);
+       }
      }
  
    /* Timeout while reading the response */

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to