Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 21:20 +0800, W B Hacker wrote: >> Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
*trim* >> With all due respect, MLM-triggered 'bounces' are a special case, and nearly >> always addressed differently than 'vanilla' bounces to 'postmaster'. > > did I mention the special case of "postmaster"? obviously *you* control > how the postmaster address is used, and I don't think it is unreasonable > to reject bounces (ie. from <>) to postmaster if the postmaster address > is never used as sender. I'm explaining that you can not reject bounces > to multiple recipients *in general*. > I don't see why not. MLM's having been covered, how often does your server transmit the same message with an envelope-from or sender that lists *multiple* local addresses as the source? I'm not sure I even know how to make the average desktop MUA DO that. So where would a *legitimate* bounce *get* the 'extra' senders to turn into multiple recipients on the bounce going back to you? Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
