Marcin Krol wrote: >> and would block only a tiny %age of spam. > > This may be so, but I would like to see some realistic numbers and > experiments to show that. My own (admittedly, quick) estimates based on > my mail logs indicate that the volume of spam cut short by callouts is > approx. 5/6 of spam, while SpamAssassin has to deal with 1/6 remaining.
Without knowing for sure what mails are spam and what are ham, we reject connections: 10% rdns + 2mx 35% helo 5% dnsbl 20% conn-dropped during delays 10% no such user 3% sender-verify Cheers, Jeremy -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
