James Price wrote:
> As I've said in the past and I'm sure most would agree as Richard Rogers
> just wrote, the regular posters here are very, very helpful and more so than
> most mailing lists that support freely available software.
>
> That being said, it seems the only person here who has issues with how
> questions are answered is Marc Perkel. Having reviewed perkel.com, I now
> understand a bit more why he is the way he is. The word "tool" comes to
> mind.
>
> That being said, I'd say ending this thread here might be a good idea. I
> know my comments might be out of line and less than professional, but I
> really am sick to death of Marc stirring up nonsense on questions that he
> didn't even ask in the first place. So let's keep it EXIM related and not
> critiques on how someone should have answered a question.
Just came across this thread in the archives. While I hate to add
further to it, I feel this will reduce the amount of arguments on the
list in future. Here's how I deal with such mail:
:0
* ^Subject: .*\[(exim|exim-dev|exim-future)\]
* ^(To|Cc): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0:
* ^From: .*<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/dev/null
:0:
* ^(References|In-Reply-To): .*<[EMAIL PROTECTED]@perkel\.com>
/dev/null
}
The list has been a lot more pleasant since I added that.
Mike
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
