--On 17 July 2007 23:30:28 +0100 "Martin A. Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If M. Perkel thinks the exim's configuration options, syntax and > documentation leave something to be desired, then sendmail's equivalent > will come as an "interesting" challenge I'm sure. He made that point by referring to sendmail configuration as apparent "modem noise". ># do special header rewriting > R$* <@> $* $@ $1 <@> $2 pass null host through > R< @ $* > $* $@ < @ $1 > $2 pass route-addr through > R$* $: $>61 $1 qualify unqual'ed names > R$+ $: $>93 $1 do masquerading ># when masquerading convert login name to firstname.lastname > R$- < @ $M . > $* $: $(realnames $1 $) < @ $M . > $2 user=>first.last > > -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex x3148 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
