John W. Baxter wrote: >On 9/13/07 4:00 AM, "Simon Hobbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Assuming I *should not* whitelist AOL, that I should put the onus >>squarely back on AOL, how should I word this message and who should I >>send it to? If I can understand the issue better, I can inform my user >>as to why the responsibility should rest with AOL. >> >> >3. Why wouldn't you whitelist the AOL servers (as distinct from @aol sender >addresses, of course), with respect to sender verification callouts? Do you >actually find AOL servers sending out messages from non-existent @aol.com >addresses? > > Primary motive is to be a good netizen. On this comment, I think I will whitelist AOL.
>4. It's not clear, however, why AOL would fail sender verification callouts >with their VERPed addresses. They do want those bounces (those are the more >useful ones to a mailing list system). > > VERP - keyword for future learning, thanks. >This has been pretty much a guess, because of the "improvements" you made in >the information you sent us. > > Thankyou, this is extremely helpful! I don't have any sysadmin colleagues to give me nice outlines like this. Simon -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
