Am Donnerstag, den 08.11.2007, 12:18 -0500 schrieb Ken Price: [...] > > Short summary: > > no. > > -- > > Is that your final answer? :-) Yes.
Of course there are situations where the answer might be different, but that seems to be quite unlikely in your case.... More precisely: I told you to calculate your cost in running a secondary MX offsite and to correlate it to your individual situation. Consider all service-level-agreements with your customers, possible legal requirements, etc. Find out wheter or not your business can survive without a secondary MX. If not: a secondary MX is worth the effort. If it can survive and there is some sort of loss you might have, then compare the exstimated cost of running a secondary MX with the cost of a major breakdown without secondary MX. If the breakdown is more expensive than the secondary MX: do it. We can only guess, but you just have to know. But I suppose if you really really needed a secondary MX, you would already know that and not ask wheter or not it is worth the effort. If you have not found a compelling reason yet, I'm sure you are unlikely to find one. Sorry. ;-) -- CU, Patrick.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
