On 4 Dec 2007, at 20:25, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> They don't. But exim_surbl provides a more lightweight way of checking
> them - and since many sites consider a SURBL or URIBL hit as a binary
> result (ie a hit = treat as spam), you can avoid the expense of
> running the message through SA.
I guess reporting potential new URLs to add to the list by mail may
not work well then :-)
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
