On 05/12/2007, Nigel Metheringham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4 Dec 2007, at 20:25, Peter Bowyer wrote: > > > They don't. But exim_surbl provides a more lightweight way of checking > > them - and since many sites consider a SURBL or URIBL hit as a binary > > result (ie a hit = treat as spam), you can avoid the expense of > > running the message through SA. > > I guess reporting potential new URLs to add to the list by mail may > not work well then :-)
Hopefully the owners of [EMAIL PROTECTED] are slightly more clueful :-) -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
