Phil (Medway Hosting) wrote: > It's not "collateral" spam. It's just plain "spam". That's the point I would > make to the powers that be !!
It is not spam, because it is neither unsolicited (by emailing someone you allow them to respond, whether automated or not, I would say) nor bulk. You shouldn't just call something spam just because you don't like it: http://www.spamhaus.org/definition.html The vacation utility on unix seems smart enough to not be a nuissance and still be functional for those who need it. Regards, Jeroen -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
