> > So put in a feature request. > > I'm not sure what the benefit is though - surely if you > have a device in front of your MTA then that > > is the place to be doing the rejection or whatever based on > where the mail comes from. Surely if you > > let your MTA do the rejection, you're going to end up with > the issue of you generating backscatter > > spam. Or am I missing something ? > > Yes - the OP said that his appliance is a proxy - presumably it holds > the incoming delivery up while it attempts to deliver internally.
Yes... if eXpurgate is acting like a proxy. The only reference to eXpurgate wrt email I could find is http://email.about.com/od/spamfilteringservices/gr/expurgate.htm which doesn't sound like what I would call a proxy. But I don't know anything more than what I read on that page, so I may well be barking up the wrong tree. > > I could see some use for this, and I don't believe it would be too > hard - if teh OP sorts out a feature request I suspect it would be > looked at. > Indeed. I've actually got a setup with two Exim servers behind a cluster of ZXTM load balancers and something like XCLIENT would make certain tasks I have a lot easier (I've found workarounds for all the issues I've had but this would be potentially neater). J -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
