Marten Lehmann wrote:
> In some cases there is no choice. You won't find an open source virus > scanner that beats or nearly reaches the same detection rates and comes > with heuristic that the world leaders Kaspersky and Symantec do. And > similar, you don't find an out-of-the-box spamfilter that has zero false > positives and a high detection rate for ISPs like eXpurgate (thats the > name of our solution). If you have ever worked with SpamAssassin, you > would know that it is no possible to use it with a good detection rate > without of much regular manual work and configuration for 500.000 > messages and more a day per mx server. > Is it that good if it doesn't even support the basic things like rbl testing and greylisting? Furthermore, the only spamfilter that has zero false positives is a disabled spamfilter, even humans make mistakes. And if you use rbls and greylisting, how can you be sure you will still have the alleged 0 false positives? Furthermore, exim supports scanning with Kaspersky.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
