Hello, > Perhaps you should look into bayesian spam filtering, like ASSP. I found > it to be very effective.
I found it to be very ineffective especially with image spam and also to cause a lot of false positives. > A spamfilter will always be high maintenance, > if you want it to be effective (for example you want to keep teaching a > bayesian filter). I believe the quality of a spamfilter depends greatly > on the quality of the admin working with it. I don't want to pay a sysadmin a train a spam filter. I want an antispam solution, that is good out-of-the-box and is trained by someone else (e.g. honeypots of the vendor). We are managing about 40.000 email addresses and currently > 1.000.000 messages daily (whereas >93% is spam). Thats nothing, that can be trained manually any more. Regards Marten -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
