Marc Perkel wrote: > > The bottleneck is the queue and I've noticed that if I use a ram disk > for the queue that I can process many times as much mail with var lower > load levels that using disk based queue. Ideally if I had a battery back > up ram disk card that would be ideal but I can't find that anywhere. > > So - that's the problem I wish to solve.
What I don't understand is how has that not solved it already? You've already partitioned the servers into a fast incoming server that immediately offloads all messages that cannot be immediately processed onto slower back-end servers, and you've already got that fast incoming server running its queue on a ram-disk. That seems like pretty much the optimal solution for your requirements. What would you change? - Marc -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
