Claus Assmann wrote: > Why not add support for PRDR? Take a look at the (unfortunately > expired) internet draft from Eric A. Hall: > > SMTP Service Extension for Per-Recipient Data Responses (PRDR) > > It is supported by one MTA (MeTA1, see http://www.meta1.org/). >
I'm not against adding three or four and seeing what works best in practice. But that needs working between at least two disparate MTA *each* of which should have some visible, sizeable, active, and expert user community that uses that MTA 'in anger' eg for revenue or 'job risk'. *OW - seriously give a damn about stuff working as it should. Call it market share if that suits. Exim has it, courier-mta has it, postfix has it, and for sure sendmail has it. And MS Exchange? But let's not go there just yet.. ;-) I'm not criticizing MeTAl, but it doesn't look to have yet even had *time* to gather that sort of acceptance. Bill -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
