--On 7 October 2008 19:49:44 +0800 W B Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am I the Lone Ranger in wanting to tilt toward an implementation ten > years in use vs one not yet even dry? NOPE. There are three suggestions so far: XEXDATA, XLMTP, and XPRDR I favour XPRDR technically (strict timeouts enable tarpitting without losing compliant hosts, for example), but XEXDATA has the advantage of having an existing implementation. XLMTP has the advantage that LMTP is in widespread use, so there's lots of code out there. I agree with you that we should favour XEXDATA because it's already out there, even though I think it is inelegant. However, I'd also advocate supporting both EXDATA and XPRDR, because that might give us code that's flexible enough to be adapted to any similar scheme. > If so, WHY so? > > Bill -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex x3148 -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
