Jeremy Harris wrote: > Jethro R Binks wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Alain Williams wrote: >> >>> It is not clear to me which machine is saying: ''Empty sender address is >>> not allowed'' - I think mr51-iz.mailpoalim.co.il >>> >>> I think that what is happening is that exim is connecting to >>> mr51-iz.mailpoalim.co.il to see if it will accept mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> and as part of it sends: >>> MAIL FROM:<> which mr51-iz.mailpoalim.co.il objects to. Which >>> suggests that that machine will not accept bounces. >> Yes. > [...] >> By all means verify the domain is valid and likely deliverable, but don't >> use callouts to third party domains: restrict them to your own >> administrative scope. > > Not everyone agrees with that position. > - Jeremy >
...or bathes frequently, eats healthy meals, avoids stepping in front of trams... All still good advice. Bill -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
