It seems that BATV/PRVS is becoming more and more common in our incoming mail stream. http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch40.html#SECTverifyPRVS
Currently it appears that a signed return path is a rarity in UCE, however as we all know it's probably only a matter of time before that changes. So my question is, and I'm strictly looking for personal opinions here; Are callout/callback verifications on the envelope sender when that sender is signed more acceptable than just doing them in general? I know SCV in general is a hot topic, I don't wish to rehash it's good/bad points, just wonder it people whom are generally against it would be more amiable if it was only done one signed return paths. -- Bryan Rawlins OnlyMyEmail, Inc. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
