On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Bryan Rawlins wrote: > > So my question is, and I'm strictly looking for personal opinions here; > Are callout/callback verifications on the envelope sender when that > sender is signed more acceptable than just doing them in general? I > know SCV in general is a hot topic, I don't wish to rehash it's good/bad > points, just wonder it people whom are generally against it would be > more amiable if it was only done one signed return paths. >
I'm not signing (at home) yet, but I'd still be against it. (if anything, they'd be less acceptable - someone trying to ID bogus bounces, and you want to increase his connect load, seems wrong) -- -------------------------------------------------------- Dave Lugo [email protected] LC Unit #260 TINLC Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks. -------------------------------------------------------- Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
