--On 30 April 2009 16:18:25 -0600 Renee <[email protected]> wrote:
> So is the general consensus that this is NOT an exim issue?? The alpine > people aren't very responsive.. Hmm, I think it's time that you posted log entries that aren't obfuscated. Given that you don't know what the problem is, you aren't in a position to guess which bits of evidence might be useful in resolving the problem. My guess is that alpine is submitting the email twice. The first time it's rejected, the second time alpine is falling back to a different configuration and succeeding. Switch on all your logging switches with "log_selector +all", run the test again, and post the result without obfuscation. > In any case, I'm curious to know why it would say it was rejecting the > off-site recipient... in general exim terms. That is, under what > circumstances would this error show up in the exim logs regardless of the > client being used to send? If I could figure that out, maybe I could > figure out why the message was popping up in the first place despite the > fact the message gets through. > > Renee > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, W B Hacker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Renee wrote: >> > Ok, I was wondering about that, but thought I'd start off with the exim >> > group just to be on the safe side. >> > >> > Thanks. >> >> '..safe side' ?? >> >> Hmmm... >> >> Well... >> >> Can't really fault your thinking. >> >> Broadly applied it keeps Taravid, Klacid, and Viagra makers wealthy, and >> the population healthier and happier... >> >> In this case, a mouseful of Google or Mark One eyeball's worth of alpine >> man page wudda been faster and cheaper though.... and no less 'fun'.. >> >> ;-) >> >> Bill >> >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:15 PM, W B Hacker <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Renee wrote: >> >>> Martin, >> >>> >> >>> I'm not sure how your response is supposed to help me....? The mails >> are >> >>> getting delivered no problem- the issue is that the error message >> >> appears- >> >>> and that it only occurs when I use al/pine. Tests from thunderbird, >> mac >> >>> mail, and similar mail clients don't exhibit this behavior, i.e. the >> >> error >> >>> message in the mail logs. >> >>> >> >>> Renee >> >> >> >> ... *that* is (one way) in which his post should be of value... >> >> >> >> You don't seem have an Exim problem per se.... >> >> >> >> You appear to have an (al)pine problem. >> >> >> >> - Given pine / alpine's history of service, it may not even be a bug, >> >> but rather the way you have configured / are using it. >> >> >> >> - A pine or alpine support group might be a better place to sort the >> >> whyso and howfix of that.... >> >> >> >> Bill Hacker >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Martin A. Brooks < >> >> [email protected]>wrote: >> >>>> On 28/04/2009 18:19, Renee wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> To a gmail account: >> >>>>> 2009-04-23 15:49:33 H=newserver.test.com [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] F=< >> >>>>> [email protected]> rejected RCPT<[email protected]>: >> >> relay >> >>>>> not >> >>>>> permitted >> >>>>> 2009-04-23 15:49:35 1Lx6nX-0001JT-Nf<= >> >>>>> [email protected]= newserver.test.com >> >>>>> [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] P=esmtpsa >> X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> FWIW, This works fine for me: >> >>>> >> >>>> mar...@fish:~$ swaks -f [email protected] -t >> >>>> [email protected] -s gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com >> >>>> === Trying gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com:25... >> >>>> === Connected to gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com. >> >>>> <- 220 mx.google.com ESMTP 21si59164ewy.42 >> >>>> -> EHLO fish.clues.ltd.uk >> >>>> <- 250-mx.google.com at your service, [80.68.93.86] >> >>>> <- 250-SIZE 35651584 >> >>>> <- 250-8BITMIME >> >>>> <- 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES >> >>>> <- 250 PIPELINING >> >>>> -> MAIL FROM:<[email protected]> >> >>>> <- 250 2.1.0 OK 21si59164ewy.42 >> >>>> -> RCPT TO:<[email protected]> >> >>>> <- 250 2.1.5 OK 21si59164ewy.42 >> >>>> -> DATA >> >>>> <- 354 Go ahead 21si59164ewy.42 >> >>>> -> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:39:36 +0100 >> >>>> -> To: [email protected] >> >>>> -> From: [email protected] >> >>>> -> Subject: test Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:39:36 +0100 >> >>>> -> X-Mailer: swaks v20061116.0 jetmore.org/john/code/#swaks >> >>>> -> >> >>>> -> This is a test mailing >> >>>> -> >> >>>> -> . >> >>>> <- 250 2.0.0 OK 1240940377 21si59164ewy.42 >> >>>> -> QUIT >> >>>> <- 221 2.0.0 closing connection 21si59164ewy.42 >> >>>> === Connection closed with remote host. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users >> >> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ >> >> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/ >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- >> ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users >> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ >> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/ -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
