----Original Message---- From: Tom Kistner [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:27 AM To: Rick Cooper Cc: Exim Users Subject: Re: [exim] DKIM and DomainKeys
> Rick Cooper wrote: > >> Is there any work being done, or a patch available, to allow signing both >> DKIM and DomainKeys without sending a message through exim twice? > > The situation right now is a bit confusing. > > I had added concurrent Domainkeys (via libdomainkeys) and DKIM (via > libdkim) signing support in CVS after the 4.69 release. That code was > never released, but some people run a snapshot of it. > > DKIM verification support was oddly implemented, and the library I used > had some limitations at that time. It also brought in additional > build-time dependencies (lstdc++, openssl). > > So I wrote my own DKIM implementation [1] which is dependency-free and > portable even to non-posix platforms like Windows. Similar to how pcre > was handled, a copy is included in the Exim source, so Exim can have > DKIM support by default on its supported platforms (I didn't try them > all of course ...). > > The code is finished and in CVS. What is missing is the documentation. I > hope to finish it next week. Domainkeys support has been dropped. I > don't really feel like bringing it back, since I now consider it to be a > dead proprietary technology. If you really need to run DKIM/Domainkeys > concurrently with Exim, your only option is to pull a CVS snapshot by > date of April last year, or use the tarball I posted back then [2]. > That explains why it appeared that domainkeys support was missing, even though the respondent had stated both worked in cvs. I suppose I will just move to just dkim but not all providers have done so and I was hoping to be able to please all. BTW: the current exim-doc in cvs appears to be broken and won't build. It appears to be broken in the section you added a couple of weeks ago referencing the DKIM support. There are a bunch of errors all pretty much like ** Error: missing closing flag %& Processing macro vitem Detected near line 34296 of spec.xfpt And since spec.xml cannot be built neither can the rest. The filter documentation builds fine. I would try and fix it but I no nothing of the xfpt syntax. Rick -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
