On tisdagen den 30 juni 2009, Tom Kistner wrote: > Rick Cooper wrote: > > Is there any work being done, or a patch available, to allow signing both > > DKIM and DomainKeys without sending a message through exim twice? > > The situation right now is a bit confusing. > > I had added concurrent Domainkeys (via libdomainkeys) and DKIM (via > libdkim) signing support in CVS after the 4.69 release. That code was > never released, but some people run a snapshot of it. > > DKIM verification support was oddly implemented, and the library I used > had some limitations at that time. It also brought in additional > build-time dependencies (lstdc++, openssl). > > So I wrote my own DKIM implementation [1] which is dependency-free and > portable even to non-posix platforms like Windows. Similar to how pcre > was handled, a copy is included in the Exim source, so Exim can have > DKIM support by default on its supported platforms (I didn't try them > all of course ...).
Oh. I guess I'll package it for Debian ASAP then. -- Magnus Holmgren [email protected] (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks) "Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
