--On 18 August 2009 19:36:09 +1000 Richard Salts <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:43:20 Magnus Holmgren wrote: >> On fredagen den 15 maj 2009, Richard Salts wrote: > [snip] >> I just have to point out again that if a message is forwarded to your > server, >> that forwarding should have been configured by the recipient himself, or >> at least with his knowledge, so, theoretically at least, it should be >> possible for you to make exceptions for such forwarding. > That's assuming that the user's mail administrator has set up some way in > which the user is able to whitelist the forwarding server. >> >> It's really not that SPF breaks forwarding, it's that the assumption >> that forwarding should work that is broken to begin with. > I find forwarding to be a useful feature, and I see no reason that > forwarded messages should be treated as second class citizens. >> It's this: the forwarder is asked to take responsibility for email that they have no control over. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
