Quoting W B Hacker: > Another reason whatever it is you are trying to do (which is WHAT? BTW?)
As per my original question, Im trying to work out why some spam hasnt been spamscanned given my config. I´m responsible for the server, though I didnt set it up and in fact Ive never had to configure the base config for Exim hence I was looking for a little advise in the event its a straight forward question, which it may or may not be! lol > This router is written to ACCEPT spam, not reject it From your first response, I think this is correct. However what is happening to accepted spam is that it is scanned, as opposed to any unselected spam which is not scanned. After this depending upon the virtual domain config the mail is then sent to a blackhole, sent to a dedicated spam mailbox or delivered to the original recipient with an update subject. If thats the case then naively I might imagine that all mail that doesnt have a transport of esmtpa or spam-scanned will be sent for spam scanning. From looking in the headers of the mails that have been delivered without scanning then dont have either of those strings listed in the header anywhere under transport or anywhere else, they show as delivered via esmtp. Possible problems with this would be, can spam be set to have these tranports to evaid my config and Im looking in the wrong place (ie this info cannot be seen in the header)? And your question about ordering of transports, which I really dont know enough about to know if I have a problematic/broken config or not, thanks for your help, Andy. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
