On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:45 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > So looking again, its actually looks like I just have something very > broken. <snip> > Its not listed anywhere in the spamassassin logs and has no spam score > etc. However you can clearly see its being recieved via SMTP, passed > to the spamcheck_pipe and then mailnull feeds it back in with the > "P=spam-scannedukgsa" that was confusing me. So Im not sure how its > being passed out via the spamcheck_pipe and back in again without > appearing in the spamassassin logs.
Methinks your problems are more serious than Exim and SA not playing well together, given the load average your box has. That said, presumably if SA thinks a message isn't spam, it has nothing to report so no output is logged. That's a local config thing for SA itself - check whether your report options are set to report all messages rather than those over-threshold. Does your SA log the Message-ID header? If so, search for that in your (presumably) /var/log/maillog. Graeme -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
