--On 11 June 2010 15:54:32 +0200 Heiko Schlittermann <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Or is this something useful for other Exim users, too? > > Could be - in case we have to prove that we didn't change the message > after reception (the hash has to be signed, of course). So, why not use the DKIM features? -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
