Ian Eiloart <[email protected]> (Fr 11 Jun 2010 18:25:45 CEST): > >>Or is this something useful for other Exim users, too? > > > >Could be - in case we have to prove that we didn't change the message > >after reception (the hash has to be signed, of course). > So, why not use the DKIM features?
Stupid question maybe: does the DKIM signature include the message body? (I always thought, it's only a signature for selected header fields.) -- Heiko
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
