George R. Kasica wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 20:02:03 -0700, you wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Phil Pennock<[email protected]> wrote:
You need to remove the build directory, and/or "make makefile" after
making changes to how Exim is built.
George, you can do 'make distclean' which does 'rm -rf build*'. The
'make makefile' won't fix every compile-oriented problem, but it fixes
most things that don't involve compile/link cli args. The 'make
distclean' wipes the build directory (the staging ground for the build
process) and starts the whole build process with a blank slate.
...Todd
OK...did the make distclean and make makefile after the edits here and
then make.
Results of each below - sadly not successful:
George,
It really, really, is not an Exim issue....
===
> Its a generic linux from scratch system more or less...startd out as a
Caldera Open Linux way back in 1995 but with the demise of that it was
converted over to a build from scratch on a new set of disks and the
data copies over around 2001 and maintained and able to compile every
version of exim up to now with no major issues.
===
Eleven years ago?
Fossil that I am, even I had moved on from FreeBSD 4.X by the FOUR year
mark. And it had not BEEN a kludge of the above sort to begin with...
Trying to keep archeo-coprolytes going by piecemeal measures is giving
rise to a collective headache. Or maybe I have the wrong end of the anatomy.
Put the latest and best onto another box, focus on upgrading those apps
that supposedly don't have modern equivalents (which I do not believe),
and prep for the classical 'parallel cutover' .. to carry you the NEXT
fifteen years if you must.
Nothing lasts forever, least of all rapidly evolving F/LOSS software..
Otherwise, the museum - or troll parking lot - is down the hall somewhere...
Bill
--
韓家標
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
