-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message <[email protected]>, Jeremy Harris
<[email protected]> writes

>On 06/02/14 16:19, Richard Clayton wrote:
>>      authentication required but no common mechanisms were found
>
>If you telnet to the smarthost, what authentication types
>does it offer?

One of them (Virgin) uses LOGIN the other uses CRAM-MD5...  I don't
think "offer" is quite the word to use for Virgin's smtps on port 465,
you're just meant to know that's what it wants you to do.

If there was a simple bodge here where I used the same method for both
then I would use it!

It may be that exim (and recall that this is exim as a client) is
supposed to pick out the correct authentication section automatically in
some way -- since there doesn't seem to be any way of specifying it
within the transport (which I half expected to be how it worked, rather
as you specify a transport within the router section)

If it is meant to be automatic then I can try (somehow?) and get some
debug output to see what is actually happening...

- -- 
richard                                                   Richard Clayton

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary 
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBUvO9LuINNVchEYfiEQKKmwCghutD1qRzpI4j+K8VtHzbKFyXNX8AoIXH
9xOpd4Ox3IiUrrM3PDSGoh9d
=aGN+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to