Marc Haber <[email protected]> (Sa 02 Mai 2015 21:39:30 CEST): > On Fri, 1 May 2015 21:38:31 +0200, Heiko Schlittermann > <[email protected]> wrote: > >Seing this, there is no bug in Exim. Exim does just what you told it to > >do. As indicated by the filter test output. > > I see. It's still clumsy behavior that the output of $h_header_foo > cannot be inserted into another header without jumping through hoops.
Which result whould you expect, if you "fold" multiple headers into one? > >Using 'headers add "x-torres-spam-score: $h_x-spam-score"' IS wrong. > yes. that violates the principle of least surprise. You try to put the values of multiple headers (of the same name) into one header. How should this be done with less suprise? (Same question as above.) -- Heiko
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
