Heiko Schlichting <[email protected]> (Mo 05 Okt 2015 17:03:51 CEST): … > Uh, oh. Normally I follow the discussions but around the release of 4.86 my > newborn (second) son had blocked "some" ressources. I've totally missed the > existence of the +fixes branch.
Congrats. Excuse accepted ;)
> So I was really surprised few days ago after upgrading exim 4.85 to 4.86
> and had crashes on different servers. Instead of trying HEAD, I rolled back
> to 4.85 immediately. After some digging I noticed that the problem was
> already fixed.
…
> It would be no problem for me to cherry-pick the bugfix. I just expected
> a new release for every severe bug (=crashes in normal production). I agree
> that it is possible to use the +fixes branch but it does not match my
> expectations what releases are for.
Yes, +fixes was the fastest possible way to distribute the important
fixes w/o starting a new release cycle and without forcing the
package/self-builders to backport/cherrypick the relevant patches by
themself.
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
