Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <[email protected]> (Mo 05 Okt 2015 22:01:47 CEST):
> On Monday 05 of October 2015, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> 
> > Yes, +fixes was the fastest possible way to distribute the important
> > fixes w/o starting a new release cycle and without forcing the
> > package/self-builders to backport/cherrypick the relevant patches by
> > themself.
> 
> Too bad that this branch contains hunks that do not apply to released 
> tarballs. git magic is required to make a patch that applies:
> 
> git log -p exim-4_86..exim-4_86+fixes --reverse \
>   -- . ":(exclude)doc/doc-*" ":(exclude)test" ":(exclude).*" > exim-git.patch
> 
> Ugly. Partial solution for tarball users could be to simply publish such 
> patch 
> on ftp in 4.86-fixes dir etc.

More I'm biased to publish an complete tarballs containing 4.86+fixes.
They contain fixed docs too.

    Best regards from Dresden/Germany
    Viele Grüße aus Dresden
    Heiko Schlittermann
-- 
 SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
 Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
 gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
 ! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to