> On 11 Jan 2016, at 12:50, Robert Blayzor <[email protected]> wrote: > > When using “errors_to” in a router, does this essentially update $return_path > ? > > Meaning, if you set errors_to in a router; at the transport $return_path is > the value set in errors_to and not he original envelope sender?
The documentation (page 196 of the PDF version, at http://www.exim.org/exim-pdf-current/doc/spec.pdf), implies the answer is YES. "If an address for which errors_to has been set ends up being delivered over SMTP, the envelope sender for that delivery is the errors_to value, so that any bounces that are generated by other MTAs on the delivery route are also sent there." It also talks about re-instating the return path by setting return_path, so I suspect it does update return_path (the variable), but not $return_path which is the value of the variable. -- Ian Eiloart Postmaster, University of Sussex +44 (0) 1273 87-3148 -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
