Mandi! Robert Blayzor In chel di` si favelave... > When using ???errors_to??? in a router, does this essentially update > $return_path ? > Meaning, if you set errors_to in a router; at the transport $return_path is > the value set in errors_to and not he original envelope sender?
Sorry, a very late answer. Seems that setting 'errors_to' in router *SUFFICES* to update $return_path. As stated some month ago, i was working on this for implementing SRS, and doing my test was finally convinced i needed to set a rewrite to full modify $return_path. Now, i've redone all my test, and also disabling address rewrite, $return_path is what i expected (eg, the ''one shot'' SRS address). Probably in my previous test i get fooled by two fact: a) Exim refuse to set $return_path if address does not exist; so, you have to verify $return_path is a verifiable address before setting it. In my test i've hitted my head on the wall for weeks, because i was testing the ''producer'' of SRS addresses before building (and testing) the consumer. b) probably there's some ''cache'' mechanism, so a restart of exim it's needed. I hope this info can be useful. Say me, please, if you have found other interesting things on this subject. -- ...ma quel suo volo certo vuol dire che bisognava volare (F. Guccini) -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
