Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <[email protected]> (So 17 Nov 2019 21:23:47 
CST):
> Surely choosing implies not using the default?  Which is possible, just
> by setting received_header_text to your choice.
>
> 4.next adds a (TLS1.x) comment to the default; we're too late
> in the release cycle to change the upcoming release.

Ok, considering the importance of the information, @Jeremy,
how big is the risk of braking anything, if we extend the default header
information to include the TLS version? If I understood well, it was
there before, but is missing now.

Maybe this would ask us adding another RC iteration, but I'd go for
it.

--
Heiko

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to