Am 18.11.19 um 10:38 schrieb Jeremy Harris via Exim-users: > On 18/11/2019 05:05, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote: >> Ok, considering the importance of the information, @Jeremy, >> how big is the risk of braking anything, if we extend the default header >> information to include the TLS version? If I understood well, it was >> there before, but is missing now. >> >> Maybe this would ask us adding another RC iteration, but I'd go for >> it. > Relatively small. I'll prepare a changeset and run it past the > testsuite. 1a.
And sorry, "now" I got it. The received header should contain the tls version, otherwise recipients can't check if the dataprotection rules in the EU (and parts of the US and other countries) are met by their counterparts or providers. As I.E. article 32 EU GDPR states: "personal data should be encrypted on transport if easily possible", and that "easy" criteria is met by TLS for mailservices. BTW: I always missed exims default level of detailed loginformations when i had to work with other mailservers ;) best regards, Marius -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
