Hi! On Wed, 08 Jan 2020, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, Tobias Klausmann via Exim-users wrote: > > user=$local_part > > verify=false > > transport = local_delivery > > If you have check_local_user you shouldn't need user=$local_part as well.
Ah, good point, thanks. > > > And this seems to work. I'll test it for a bit and report back. > > > > Is the use of $local_part in the transports seen as safe, or > > should I cange those to use $home as well? > > On principle I would say change them too. > If $home and /home/$local_part are different directories which do you want ? > The one from the password file/database or the one derived from the > potential hacker's input ? > If /home fills up and you put a new user on a different > disk/partition/volume $home will still work, but /home/$local_part > would need attention ... Yeah, you're right. I presume I need no extra steps for $home being defined in the context of the transports? Best, Tobias -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
