Tom Berger wrote:
> Hi!
> Mr Icaza, spokesman of the well-known
> 'uh-it's-1.0-but-not-'really'-stable-yet' GNOME group has this to say
> about KDE:
>
> "I don't think KDE has a future at this point, it's not
> completely free yet and it's bound to a single
> programming language in Unix. Gnome from the
> very beginning has been accessible through any
> language. We are providing the GUI for all the
> languages and programmers can choose the
> language they like the most," says Miguel.
>
> (Ref.: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_321000/321433.stm)
>
> Comments? I won't comment on this because I might use some words which
> aren't applicable to this list...
>
> Annoyed
>
> tom
>
> --
> "While the NT Testanlage an intensive Tuning experienced by Microsoft
> specialists, at the Linux version one did not screw." (from Babelfish)
> Thomas 'Tom' Berger, [EMAIL PROTECTED] No UCE. No spam. 'nuff said.
> Questions? Answers! The a.o.l.m.-FAQ at http://aolmfaq.tsx.org
Apparantly, the Gnome Group is more concerned with programmers choosing a
language than the opinion of ordinary folks already satisfied and using KDE
regularly. Linux does not need this attitude. Its quite disappointing
especially when it comes from people that should be helping Linux reach the
desktop.
Gilbert
