Tom Berger wrote:
>
> Hi!
> Mr Icaza, spokesman of the well-known
> 'uh-it's-1.0-but-not-'really'-stable-yet' GNOME group has this to say
> about KDE:
>
> "I don't think KDE has a future at this point, it's not
> completely free yet and it's bound to a single
There ARE still license problems with the newest license. And they
haven't even distributed Qt source UNDER that license yet.
> programming language in Unix. Gnome from the
True. What if I don't WANT to use C++ for my GUI programming? I'm up a
creek if I want to write to KDE.
And if I want it cross-platform? Has Qt been ported to Windows?
> very beginning has been accessible through any
> language. We are providing the GUI for all the
> languages and programmers can choose the
> language they like the most," says Miguel.
Sounds perfectly rational to me. Maybe a bit of salesmanship, but how
else are you supposed to let people know why GNOME might be a better
choice than KDE?
--
Steve Philp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
