On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, John Aldrich wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, you wrote: > > Yes but you can rig up a serial link (better yet a parallel link) with > > spare speaker wire and get better than floppy speeds with out the floppy > > inconvienence. > > > Ah. Ok. I can see this....however, even standard telephone > cable ought to be useable for an ethernet link between a > couple of computers in one room (assuming that's what the > original poster was talking about.) You won't get the > distance you would with CAT5 cable, but it SHOULD work.... > Requires cards, the other just ports. which is more standard? ;)
- [expert] Serial link Carl St-Jacques
- Re: [expert] Serial link Civileme
- Re: [expert] Serial link Jean-Louis Debert
- Re: [expert] Serial link John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] Serial link Axalon
- Re: [expert] Serial link John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] Serial link Axalon
- Re: [expert] Serial link John Aldrich
- Re: [expert] Serial link Ty C. Mixon
- Re: [expert] Serial link Stephen Carville
- Re: [expert] Serial link Carl St-Jacques
- Re: [expert] Serial link Jean-Louis Debert
- Re: [expert] Serial link Axalon
- RE: [expert] Serial link Carl St-Jacques
- Re: [expert] Serial link Bug Hunter
- Re: [expert] Serial link Stephen Carville
- Re: [expert] Serial link Axalon
