Point well taken. Although as i said, its just an experimental machine at
this point. I have a client who wants to move about 25 websites, but all are
done in frontpage. He wants off the server hes on now (NT)
I will check out that site though.
Thanks for the info on the security problems.
Kirk
On Tue, 05 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> I have stayed out of this until now, but I have to vent.
>
> Why are we trying to put a failed system on a good one?
>
> http://www.insecure.org/sploits/Microsoft.frontpage.insecurities.html
>
> Posted April 23 1998. I test them occasionally. They still seem to work rather
> well. Too well in fact.
>
> Why?
>
> Because FrontPage is a Brain-damaged proggie that insists on su type access to your
> site. Isn't that just lovely? And FP extensions give it to them!
>
> Don't get radical about many things, but here I am sending mail out of my root
> account because I didn't want to wait to get to a regular user account.
>
> FrontPage extensions, brrrrrrr.
>
> But if you are going to try to use the garbage like FrontPage from the other end, at
> least go to linuxberg and get Demoroniser. It is 8.5K and does a wonderful job of
> cleaning up Microsoft errors and HTML incompatibilities.
>
> I am not disparaging your efforts, mind you. I am asking you to re-think your
> PURPOSE.
>
> Civileme
>
>
> Civileme
>
>
> Herve Amoussou wrote:
>
> > Kirk Whiting a �crit :
> >
> > > I have recently installed the frontpage extensions on a test machine. Is there
> > > a good how-to yet? I am having trouble getting the admin to setup new accounts.
> > > It seems to eat all the processor and goes nowhere.
> > >
> > > any help would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Kirk
> >
> > The FP extensions are troublesome with Apache. On windows 98 i have a FP web site
> > powered by Apache win32 that works very well. u just have to use a single main
> > page in FP with HTML links only.Currently trying same config on LM60
