> Actualy there is. 7.0 has everything we can give you without haveing to
> retain (another) lawyer. The two missing pieces are the css-auth, and a
> decoder.
[...]
> Their case is total crap, the only way it will standup is if the person to
> actualy do the reverse engineering at one time actualy worked for these
> people, and was privy to the code used.

        If their case is so obviously wrong, why can you not distribute
css-auth and the decoder?  I thought that, since their request for an
immediate injunction failed, you could distribute whatever you wanted to?

--Derek

Reply via email to