Hi,

Coming from just reading the thread about Netscape and it's dumb library
using so much ram I have a question:

I know that Linux uses all the ram it can take, using the unused amount
for cache and buffers.
So I start X, WindowMaker, some xterms, Netscape, gFTP, and after that
StarOffice. Then there is about 170M of my 192M used. Now I close
StarOffice. I know that some of it stays in the cache so it starts
faster the second time. I restart it and to my surprise my box starts
using the swap partition!

Here are relevant parts of 'top' with the M command:

  7:13pm  up 1 day,  1:26,  7 users,  load average: 0.08, 0.05, 0.04
51 processes: 49 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states:  0.5% user,  2.7% system,  0.0% nice, 96.6% idle
Mem: 193024K av, 183864K used,  9160K free, 54972K shrd, 27524K buff
Swap:  120452K av,     384K used,  120068K free      108108K cached

 PID USER  PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT  LIB %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
6478 root  17   0  24728  24M  2172 R       0  0.3 12.8   1:18 X
7232 wobo   0   0 17476  17M  9264  S    7296  0.0  9.0   0:44
ld-linux.so.2
6880 root   0   0  4648 4264  3616  S       0  0.0  2.2   0:00 kdm
 417 xfs    0   0  3828 3828   824  S       0  0.0  1.9   0:03 xfs
 7247 wobo  0   0  3744 3744  3168  S       0  0.0  1.9   0:00
netscape-comm
 7385 wobo  0   0  3724 3724  2756  S       0  0.0  1.9   0:34 gftp

As you can see there is a cache of 108108K. So if the cache doesn't get
reduced in favour of userspace, isn't there the danger of getting a
"Sorry, mate, no more free RAM! Close some apps to go on" message if I
continue to open and close apps?
I thought with 192M of RAM I'd never see swap used due to unsufficient
amount of physical ram.

Or is there a command to flush the cache (without danger of data-loss)?

wobo
-- 
GPG Fingerprint 519E 2627 FE60 91F5 32AA  6862 CE9D 800A 3876 EF13 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux Mandrake's Home: http://www.linux-mandrake.com
########## LLaP (Linux Lovers are Perfect!) #########

Reply via email to