I also experienced the same. I don't know how linux manage the
memory, but for me, it looks like winblow$ who eat memory and never
let them out again. 

Also, I experienced bad performance in multitasking with some
disk-related activity (such as ftp, cp, mv) - even when you "ls",
it tooks almost like forever.

regards,

isa


On Sun, 06 Feb 2000 19:25:44 +0100, you wrote:

| Hi,
| 
| Coming from just reading the thread about Netscape and it's dumb library
| using so much ram I have a question:
| 
| I know that Linux uses all the ram it can take, using the unused amount
| for cache and buffers.
| So I start X, WindowMaker, some xterms, Netscape, gFTP, and after that
| StarOffice. Then there is about 170M of my 192M used. Now I close
| StarOffice. I know that some of it stays in the cache so it starts
| faster the second time. I restart it and to my surprise my box starts
| using the swap partition!
| 
| Here are relevant parts of 'top' with the M command:
| 
|   7:13pm  up 1 day,  1:26,  7 users,  load average: 0.08, 0.05, 0.04
| 51 processes: 49 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
| CPU states:  0.5% user,  2.7% system,  0.0% nice, 96.6% idle
| Mem: 193024K av, 183864K used,  9160K free, 54972K shrd, 27524K buff
| Swap:  120452K av,     384K used,  120068K free      108108K cached
| 
|  PID USER  PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT  LIB %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
| 6478 root  17   0  24728  24M  2172 R       0  0.3 12.8   1:18 X
| 7232 wobo   0   0 17476  17M  9264  S    7296  0.0  9.0   0:44
| ld-linux.so.2
| 6880 root   0   0  4648 4264  3616  S       0  0.0  2.2   0:00 kdm
|  417 xfs    0   0  3828 3828   824  S       0  0.0  1.9   0:03 xfs
|  7247 wobo  0   0  3744 3744  3168  S       0  0.0  1.9   0:00
| netscape-comm
|  7385 wobo  0   0  3724 3724  2756  S       0  0.0  1.9   0:34 gftp
| 
| As you can see there is a cache of 108108K. So if the cache doesn't get
| reduced in favour of userspace, isn't there the danger of getting a
| "Sorry, mate, no more free RAM! Close some apps to go on" message if I
| continue to open and close apps?
| I thought with 192M of RAM I'd never see swap used due to unsufficient
| amount of physical ram.
| 
| Or is there a command to flush the cache (without danger of data-loss)?
| 
| wobo

Reply via email to