It is really more of an engine than either an adapter or an emulator, it
it what the programs use to call for the hardware to do something, I
think of it as kind of the same thing as X. If a windows programs needs
a windows opened it calls the api -{ either ms or wine }- and the the
api engine does the work.
Vic wrote:
>
> Sorry to butt in, is wine an "adaptor" or an "emulator"?
>
> I have heard both from different sources.
>
> On Sun, 09 Apr 2000, Michael Holt mewed:
> > Well, in my dictionary 'WINE' stands for WINdows Emulator.
> >
> > Mike Fieschko wrote:
> >
> > > >>> "Michael" == Michael Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > Michael> What kind of problems? I've heard their OS version of
> > > Michael> linux wasn't doing to hot, but I was hearing that WINE is
> > > Michael> working out pretty good. I had doubts at first because
> > > Michael> anything that's emulated *should* be slower than the real
> > > Michael> thing, but again, I've been hearing the opposite.
> > >
> > > [snipped stuff, especially unnecessary html from Mozilla]
> > >
> > > But Wine is not an emulator.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike Fieschko, West Orange, NJ, USA
> > > X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1.8 XEmacs and random-sig.el
> > > Kernel 2.2.15-0.17mdk
> > > http://www.viconet.com/fieschko/home.htm
> > > Apr 8 Feria of Lent
> >
> > --
> > Michael Holt
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> My new linux web server with Apache
> http://kittypuss.dnydns.org
>
> Sign up for ClickDough and get paid to surf the web.
> http://secure.clickdough.com/servlets/cr/CRSignup.po?referral_id=kittypuss
