Charles Curley wrote:
> 
> On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 10:52:22AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -> On 31 May, Charles Curley wrote:
> -> > ->    Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
> -> > -> /dev/hda1             1       277   2094088+   6  FAT16
> -> > -> /dev/hda2           278       556   2109240    5  Extended
> -> > -> /dev/hda3   *       557       563     52920   83  Linux
> -> > -> /dev/hda4           564      1268   5329800   83  Linux
> -> > -> /dev/hda5           278       556   2109208+   7  HPFS/NTFS
> -> > ->
> 
> hda2 is an extended partition, both according to the file system ID and what
> it does: it holds other, logical, partitions within it. hda5 is labeled 7,
> NTFS or HPFS, but it really is an extended partition. I don't know how it
> got created or labled, but it should never have been created, and, having
> been created an extended partition, it should have been IDed as such.

Are you making this up ??? All what is says is that the _logical_
partition (hda5) completely fills the _extended_ partition (hda2),
which is perfectly legal !!!!
NOTHING (I repeat, nothing) says that hda5 is an _extended_ partition
...


-- 
Jean-Louis Debert        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
74 Annemasse  France
old Linux fan

Reply via email to