On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:23:36PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-> On 31 May, Lee Willis wrote:
-> > Charles Curley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
-> > 
-> >> hda2 is an extended partition, both according to the file system ID and what
-> >> it does: it holds other, logical, partitions within it. hda5 is labeled 7,
-> >> NTFS or HPFS, but it really is an extended partition. I don't know how it
-> >> got created or labled, but it should never have been created, and, having
-> >> been created an extended partition, it should have been IDed as such.
-> > 
-> > As far as I can see, and from what I understand it's a logical
-> > partition, and it is perfectly legal!. Logical partitions are IDed as
-> > what they are (In this case NTFS), exactly the same way as primary
-> > partitions are. The very fact that it is "hda5" says that it is logical,
-> > it doesn't need any further IDing!
-> > 
-> 
-> So is the fact that my extended partition appears as a drive to my NT, and
-> that part of that partition is used for linux swap a problem? The way
-> Charles's drive looks like this:
-> 
->    Device Boot    Start      End   Blocks   Id  System
-> /dev/hda1   *         1        9    18112+  83  Linux native
-> /dev/hda2            10     1022  2042208    5  Extended
-> /dev/hda5            10      368   723712+  83  Linux native
-> /dev/hda6           369      727   723712+  83  Linux native
-> /dev/hda7           728      858   264064+  83  Linux native
-> /dev/hda8           859      989   264064+  83  Linux native
-> /dev/hda9           990     1022    66496+  82  Linux swap
-> 
-> Notice that his extended partition has *nothing* in it. All the data for the
-> partition is contained in logical partitions.

No, my extended partition has all the logical partitions in it.

Your extended partition has one logical drive in it, the NTFS logical
partition.

-> 
-> With my setup, it seems to me like the extended partition is seen by NT as
-> containing data in it.... Actually, I'll try rebooting in NT to see what
-> size the partition has to see if the 240-od MB of swap I allocated are the
-> size of the D drive on NT. If so, that would be my problem right there. I'll
-> have to reconfigure the extended partition on with Partition Magic to fix
-> this. I'll send another message once I've done this.

I suspect that NT sees your FAT partition as C: and the NTFS one as D:
(Unless you've been playiong with NT's disk administrator). In that case,
making either your one extended partition (hda2, if I recall correctly) or
the one logical partition (at hda5, IIRC), a swap partition will eat your
D: drive.



-> 
-> L
-> 
-> -- 
-> Laurent Duperval                   "Montreal winters are an intelligence test,
-> U|Force - Java Center                     and we who are here have failed it."
-> Phone: (514) 282-8484 ext. 228                                   -Doug Camilli
-> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]      Penguin Power!
-> 

-- 

                -- C^2

No windows were crashed in the making of this email.

Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley

Reply via email to