Monte Milanuk wrote:

> I'm getting ready to stick Mandrake on a machine that will
> be primarily a firewall for the rest of the LAN.  No X,
> none of the neat little doo-dads that Mandrake is famous
> for, just a stripped down minimum system.  Once at this
> stage, what are the benefits of Mandrake vs Redhat, SuSE,
> Debian, etc.  I mean, once you take away X and all the GUI
> config tools, what does Mandrake have left to offer, beyond
> Pentium optimization?
>
> TIA,
>
> Monte
>
> =====
>
> "Here, catch!  Don't worry, it won't bite...BBZZZZAAAAPPP!!!...much <snicker>"
>
> What an unsuspecting mechanic hears as he learns to never, ever, play 'Catch' with a 
>bored electrician  ;)
>
> Monte Milanuk
>

Sorry for jumping in this late but you might want to take a look at a  freeSCO 
installation.  a floppy, 16Mg
ram a couple of network cards you're done ( no hard drive )

works great for me.

--
Joseph S Gardner

Senior Designer / Technical Support
Kirby Co., Cleveland, OH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The box said,
"Requires Windows 3.x or better",
so I got Linux.

Registered Linux user #1696600



Reply via email to