Vincent,
Vincent Danen wrote:
> ago. If this has been going on for a month, then someone should have
> said something. However, on the same token, two individuals now have
> indicated that they did in fact recieve messages, so it makes it even
> more unclear. Unfortunately, the timing is very bad as our "mailing
> list guru" is gone for the week and I don't know anything about sympa
> nor have access to fix anything if it is indeed broken.
Some have already noted that the last security message was Dec 18th...
interestingly, it was on Dec 19th that I posted my analysis of message
replication. Denis responded privately and we exchanged some ideas; though I'm
not sure if he made any changes at that time.
Also coincidentally, on Jan 10, he sent me this:
> I added something really nasty to .procmailrc:
>
> :O Wh: dupes.lock
> | formail -D 8192 dupes.cache
>
> No cross posting of qny kind cqn get trough this anymore ;->
The exchanges match the dates others have mentioned...
HTH,
Pierre
