Jerry,
It would appear I'm totally irritated and irritating tonight (sigh).
Glad you got it sorted out, and replying to your own e-mail is not bad
form if it adds useful and relevant info to your original post, which, in
this case it does. But the form of your post is rather incoherent, as you
are attributing to me, at least, the entirety of *your* last post. Maybe
it's the way the quoting in your email program is set up. But, hell, I can
live with that.
I really wanted to know if my suggestions regarding your
/etc/cups/cupsd.conf file were of any value.
On 19-Jan-2001 Jerry Sternesky wrote:
> On Thursday 18 January 2001 20:39, Jerry Sternesky wrote:
> OK Bad form replying to your own email.
[and Jerry's previous post]
> On Tuesday 16 January 2001 10:41, b5dave wrote:
> OK cups is alive and staying alive. I also get the ghostscript rpms
> t-shirt, I forgot I had the install cd in the drive and after select
> printerdrake. Bam! I was a member of the club.
[etc .... snip]
No, b5dave (me) didn't write any of that!
I'm not dissin' you, Jerry, and I can appreciate the euphoria of
overcomming CUPS problems, but your quoting of our exchange has even *me*
confused as to who said what. I like to think of these exchanges as
reference material for other users. The issue of whether one should place
the quote before or after the reply may never be resolved, but both
methods can be clear about who said what.
peace ... love .... LSD. It's all good. Sorry about my complaining.
It's all good.
(I guess I should now sign all my posts as b5dave since there are several
other "Dave's" on the list ... and perhaps update my medication ...)
peace,
b5dave
